Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Modi is the only leader who can bridge the Center State ever widening GAP


UPA 2 has failed badly in building confidence with the States.

1.       One reason can be Congress has no big regional leader, who can guide them in building trust and confidence with other regional Leaders.

2.       All there State Leaders are more interested in Union Jobs rather than understanding current Regional Issues.

3.       In Future, India might witness more Friction between the Centre and the States.

4.       Looking at the current scenario, UPA will not be able to match to these future complex issues.

5.       Be it financial issues of GTC or security issues in NCTC, UPA has not been able to work with the different Federal Leaders.

6.       Result is, India is suffering.

Before we move to why Modi, let us try to figure out what about other regional Heads?

1.       People might argue that Nitish Kumar will be able to smoothen the Federal - Union Frictional Environment.

2.       He has worked in the Central Government as well as right now leading a State.

3.       At an individual Level, this can be justified, but the drawback in this case is that his party is not a National Party.

4.       In case if he leads the government then he would always be trying to patch a BIG BIG Coalition and might not be able to deliver in that structure.

5.       The same case replicates with other Regional Leaders like Mamta, Naveen, Mulayam, Sharad pawar etc. All have this drawback; their parties are too small to lead any government at the Centre.

This is what Modi brings that no other leader has in today's political environment.

1.       He has been successfully leading a State to a glorious future.

2.       He has been able to achieve good growth in his state in spite of a Hostile centre.

3.       He will understand all aspirations of a Federal Head. And can talk to other Federal Heads in a language that they can understand as he has been in this Job since last 12+ years.

4.       The advantage he has that other Good federal Leaders dont have is that he represents the Second largest Political Party.

5.       The support that JDU cannot offer to Nitish will be available to Modi from BJP in the Centre.

6.       This unique combination of a regional Head and a National Political Party will be able to bridge the complex State Centre divide.

7.       On top of it Modi is one of the most popular National Level Leaders CURRENTLY IN A REGIONAL ROLE. Hence this will again help him out in is endeavours. With Modi, India will be in a Win-Win situation whether we look from Federal or Central Perspective.

Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Direct Cash Transfer will be a curse for Women and Children of India


1.       Direct Cash Transfer will be a curse for Women and Children of India

2.       The UPA government wants to give money directly to people WITHOUT ANY CONTROL

3.       Can the UPA commit that this Tax Payers Money will not be distributed to any ANTI National and this money will not fund any Anti National Activities.

4.       Before we move forward we need to understand the ground situation in India

5.       The ground reality is that Women and Children have a very little say when it comes to managing money

6.       In the current Subsidy system, Families get a set quantity of Food material, Kerosene etc.

7.       Hence all the time the subsidized material would meet its purpose.

8.       Are we sure that when we would give cash, then how much it benefit the Family.

9.       In many cases: Men in the family would wait for the day when money will get transferred into their account.

10.   The next step would be to take that money to the Liquor Shops.

11.   Hence the benefit of the cash transfer will not go to the family members but to the Liquor Barons.

12.   In some other cases, there can be many emergency situations that can come across the family.

13.   These emergency situations might not be as important as Food but still when there is money in account, you tend to think differently.

14.   Who will suffer?

15.   I request the UPA government to reconsider this scheme as it will bring more evil then good.

Sunday, 18 November 2012

Thank god: Nov of 2012 was totally different from the Nov of 1984



1.       Today all Indians must be relieved after a very peaceful cremation of Shri Balasaheb Ji.

2.       Whenever a Big Political figure expires, there is always danger to peace.

3.       India experienced Sikh Massacre when Indira Gandhi expired in 1984.

4.       It is alleged that Congress workers were behind the Sikh Genocide.

5.       They probably got agitated for the Death of their Supreme Commander and forgot that Ordinary Sikhs were not responsible for the same.

6.       Probably Congress Leadership / Police/ Human Right Activists also turned a blind eye to the Sikh Community.

7.       Shiv Saniks have always been associated as a violent political group.

8.       They have shown aggression in different Political / Ideological Situations.

9.       But the Behaviour displayed by the Cadre was something that must be recognized and appreciated.

10.   Probably this is Shri Balasahib ji’s Legacy.

11.   It is unfortunate that a Great Leader like Indira Gandhi’s Legacy will always have the Sikh Massacre as a very big Black Spot.

Sunday, 4 November 2012

Building Political Capital with your KARMA versus Inheriting Political Capital because of your JANMA



1.       Next Year General Elections are said to be a contest between Shri Modi and Master Rahul Gandhi.

2.       In other words we can re-define the contest to be between the theory of Karma and Janma.

3.       Coming from a Poor background, working in different roles, winning elections consistently does not guarantee Shri Modi to be the Prime Minister Candidate of the BJP.

4.       Where-as by taking JANMA in the Gandhi Family makes Master Rahul Gandhi to be Number 2 in Congress party.

5.       It has taken Years of Hard work for Mr Modi to build all the Political Capital and he can be Proud of being a true karma Yogi.

6.       On other hand, Master Rahul Gandhi who inherited the Political Capital generated From Shri Nehru to Mrs Indira to Shri Rajiv to Mrs Sonia, has not been able to achieve that can be spoken about.

7.       A Rich man inheriting a lot of Money gets richer, because of Interest Income being accumulated with time.

8.       But if he is a Bad investor than he risks losing all the previously accumulated capital, leave alone creating new Capital.

9.       Looking at the UP Election Assembly results this example can be associated with the Young Gandhi Icon loosing  the Political Capital Accumulated by Previous Congress Icons.

10.   On the Other hand Mr Modi can be looked upon as a ‘Young’ Poor Entrepreneur who has set an example for a young nation like India on what a true Karma Yogi can achieve.

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Indian Army must show compassion for Foreign DNA just like Congress Party.



1.       There are Media reports that Indian Army ordered an ‘investigation’ into one of its Major, coming in contact with a foreign national.

2.        Army Major, in order to get married to the foreign national, tried quitting from the service as the Army rules don’t allow serving officers to marry foreign nationals, his superiors refused to relieve him of his duties citing ‘staff crunch. As suggested in some Media Reports.

3.       I think The Indian Army needs to take some lessons from the Congress Party.

4.       The Congress party was supposed to be in all kind of troubles and falling apart.

5.       But then Congress party chose Sonia Gandhi to lead the party as well as our nation.

6.       The results were good as the Foreign DNA helped the congress party in coming to power consecutively.

7.       When Foreign DNA can decide who will be the Defence Minister/Prime Minister then how Indian Army can have rules that serving officers can not marry foreign nationals.

8.       The same way Congress party got better with Foreign DNA, I believe our Army can also walk on the same lines.

Monday, 8 October 2012

Jairam Ji and Shri Ram Ji VERSUS Toilet and Temple



1.       A Cabinet minister of a Secular (Hindu Majority) Country suggested that Toilets are more Holy then the Resting Place of Shri Ram.

2.       If we take this example further, is the minister suggesting that Toilet Paper is more holy then the Gita?

3.       Is this an example of Secularism practised by the Congress party?

4.       Can Jairam ji use the same example in comparing Holy symbols of Other Faith Symbols?

5.       Why not the Minister used the Holy symbols of Minority Religion Holy symbols?

6.       Is the Residence of Jairam Ji (Cabinet Minister) holier then Toilets?

7.       Let us calculate the Total Space used by all our Political leaders for their Residences. And Let us compare all the total space occupied by the Temples.

8.       I have a feeling that our Political Gods will overtake our Religious Gods, when calculating the total space used by them.

9.       Should we use space occupied by RajGhat when doing the comparisons?

10.   Is Shri Ram to be blamed that this country has not given decent sanitations to the citizens of this country?

11.   Is the blame game now to be played between the Congress party and Hinduism on sanitation condition of this Country.

12.   Or we must hold accountable the Government.

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Kejriwal Ji please vacate the Civil Activist Chair


1.       We all would like to Request Politician Kejriwal to vacate the Civil Activists Chair because you are now a Main stream politician.

2.       Civil Activism and Main Stream Political Party are two very different Boats.

3.       I think Kejriwal wants to keep one Foot on each of them.

4.       Just like a Typical Politician who never wants to leave his chair, I believe Arvind also is still greedy about his Civil Activist Chair.

5.       I believe a main stream Politician cannot be a civil Activist. It means that the Police and the Prosecutor are the same.

6.       Propriety demands the same. This is not healthy for any Democracy.

7.       Tomorrow when a Civil Activist will protest against your Political Party then members of your Political party must respond to them and Not Civil Activists of your Party.

8.       In a News Discussion your Political party members (Manish Sisodia and Mayank Gandhi) appeared as Social Activists. At least the News Channel termed them as Social Activists. I think they should appear as Kejriwal’s Political Party members and not give opinion as social activists.