Congressmen defending Gujarat oops sorry, Assam Riots

Congressmen defending Gujarat oops sorry, Assam Riots

The Latest Riots in Incredible Indian history are significant because they give an insight on How Congressmen Would have defended the Gujarat Riots:

The following statements have been given by the Congressmen on Assam Riots (Just replace Assam with Gujarat and the rest is history)

Tarun Gogoi: If Centre knew, why didn't they send army earlier?

All the time for Gujarat riots we were criticizing Modi for calling the Army Late during Gujarat Riots and Congress Chief Minister just confirms that the Chief Minister can do nothing on this.

By the way in how many days was Army called for an Unexpected Event (Gujarat Riots) and in How many days was the army called where there were intelligence reports available9(Assam Riots)

A leading News Channel is now blaming the Army that it was not interested in going to Assam. De we allow Army to decide on such matters. Did Army reject going to Gujarat also?

Digvijaya: Assam has Ethnic Conflict History

Is this a justification for Riots. Then in that case Gujarat also had Communal Violence History before 2002.

Digvijaya: Gogoi cannot resign as you cannot judge the performance of Chief Minister on One incident

Hence we cannot judge the Performance of Modi on 2002 (Only One incident). Rather there have been no riots in Gujarat since 2002.

Digvijaya: When any Incident takes place it is the District Administration that tries to control the situation. We need to give them sufficient time to see that the situation is under control. The Army cannot be brought in every incident.

Let us use the same reasoning for 2002

Digvijaya: This is the fourth similar incident in last 2 decades.

Hope we don’t use this one ever.

Manishankar Aiyar: Gogoi has done wonderful job in Assam but it is the Local Administration was at fault.

Let us use this statement as is For Gujarat. Oops For Mani and Other Congress leaders, Gujarat means only and only N Modi.

Manishankar Aiyar: I am impressed with the fact (after Displacement of so many Assames)  the Administration is acting and is doing a good job.

Let us replace Assames by Gujaratis.

Manishankar Aiyar: BJP is totally discredited in Assam.

People will say Congress is totally discredited in Gujarat hence we must not listen to Congress.

Congressmen have been reasoning that Riots happened in Rural area but 2002 happened in the city of Ahmadabad. Well 1983 happened in the Capitol of India i.e New Delhi or was Delhi rural in 1983.

All congressmen have been explaining the reason on why the Riots happened.  All have different Technicalities. Let us try and put those technicalities for 2002.

I can go and try to find similar Statements by Congressmen when defending 1983.  And then reuse the same statements for 2002.

Similarly i can go back and look at the comments made for Bhagalpur and so on.

In China, communists killed Buddhism; In India Pseudo Secularists want to kill Hinduism

In China, communists killed Buddhism; In India Pseudo Secularists want to kill Hinduism

Every Indian regardless of his religion, faith, belief, cast or creed must have a special sensitivity towards Hinduism.

The Pseudo Secularists and many activists will consider the above statement as a very communal.

Islam is being practised by people in many different countries. Many scholars in different countries are researching further into the religion. Many governments and countries follow the very same religion. Funding / support are available from different states. Islam is not dependent on any group/ country or government.

The same can be said about Christianity. It gets support from many different quarters.

Let us look on what happened with Buddhism.  It found great following in China and became as the Faith of many Chinese. But as we recall History, we will see how the Chinese Communists killed the very same religion. Because Buddhism was not practised by any other group/ country hence it leads to its Death. Only Exiled Tibetans are now the torch bearers of the dim Buddhist flame.

Similarly Hinduism is also only practised by Indians. What will happen if we Indians (ALL FAITHS) do not support the very same religion? What happens if we don’t support this part of CIVILIZATION/ CULTURE/FAITH.

Hindu Faith symbols are found in India. 

We do not have Big Christianity or Islamic Symbols. We should develop them. But we must first try and preserve The Hindu Faith Symbols because if we falter at this then the next generations will know nothing about them. Generations of other faiths will be fortunate to view their faith symbols, if not in India then all across the Globe but Hindu faith generations will not be so lucky.

Today, if you wear anything saffron then you are in danger of being branded as Communal. 

Our Politicians also uses Saffron Terror as a Terrorist Group.  Let us not move into the Political space as they have vested Interests. 

But as a part of this Civilization and an Indian we must not repeat Chinese History. We all, regardless of our Political Affliation/Faith/Caste must support Hinduism.

We must all contribute towards this faith, not because this is a religion but because we all Indians have a responsibility in contributing towards this great symbol of CIVILIZATION.

Thank you Mamta for letting the president Nominee out of the COTERIE

Thank you Mamta for letting the president Nominee out of the COTERIE

A Lot of people have been criticizing Mamata for disclosing the participants of the UPA Presidential Nominee. She is now standing alone as she got the word out of the COTERIE.

She is a Grass root leader. I believe she speaks openly and does not believe in the COTERIE culture. And probably she felt it was important for the citizens of this country know on what is happening with the Highest Post of this country.

Today if the word is out that all the credit goes to Mamta. If she wouldn’t have had that interaction then i am sure that today also we all would have been speculating and would have been waiting to hear from the COTERIE.

But as a citizen of this country don’t I deserve to know who my President Nominees are.  Every day Media was speculating on the Possible Nominees. The decision was being taken by the COTERIE. We as citizens were hoping that one day the COTERIE will let us know who will it be.

Should we penalise Mamta for not following the COTERIE Politics or embrace her for actually believing in Democracy (Taking it out to the People).

Mr Krishna must now Protest with MCA for Mishandling SRK as it was done with the US Government

Mr Krishna must now Protest with MCA for Mishandling SRK as it was done with the US Government

Not far back Mr SRK was stopped for questioning by US Security Guards. Our External Affairs Minister was pained and openly protested with the US Government.

The Protest was so real and strong that the US Spokesperson had to regret for taking their security seriously.

This time around MR SRK’s Stardom was AGAIN challenged by a security guard who must be earning 10,000 Rs a Month.

When we cannot let US Security Guards to perform their duty how can we let an Indian Security guard get away with the same. Following the last precedence set by Our External Affairs Minister, the same must be repeated.

The security guard has to now pay a price for performing his duty.

Mr SRK defended his action by taking cover of a little girl who was ALLEGEDLY mishandled and he got annoyed.  He forgot that the very same girl must be watching when he would be abusing and shouting. Probably King Khan has the right for the same.

I am sure, when he was in US he never lost his cool. He never would have given abuses to the very same Security Guards.

But here in this case he had the right to abuse the security guard .Because he knows the External Affairs Minister would support this action. (This is a joke, please laugh..T his is all we can do looking at this incident)

Just One Q: Why has SRK still not lodged an FIR against the guard who ALLEGEDLY mishandled the girl.
Probably, He does not trusts the law (probably that is why he wanted to teach the guard a lesson by abusing him)

Politics ended the Acting Career of Shri Amitabh, Now it’s the turn of Cricketing Career of Shri Sachin

Politics ended the Acting Career of Shri Amitabh, Now it’s the turn of Cricketing Career of Shri Sachin

If we go back in the history books we will remember that when Shri Amitabh was at the peak of his career, he got affiliated to a Political Party. He was given a Lok Sabha ticket and got elected as an MP.

Mr Amitabh was the biggest celebrity then but as he entered Politics:

1.   The acting career of Mr Amitabh took a big down fall.

2.   He was made a scapegoat in the Bofors Scandal.

3.   He and His family suffered socially and politically during that period.

The Political Party on the other hand got the benefit of the Biggest Celebrity joining there cadre.

There are allegations that later on he was dumped and even hounded by the same Political Outfit. But never the less he was fully utilized by the Political Outfit for their Political Purpose.

Now I fear it is the turn of Shri Sachin’s Cricketing Career.

Today the same Political Outfit is trying to repeat the same act. Today Shri Sachin is the biggest celebrity. He has the biggest Fan Following and Commands Respect all over India.

On the other hand the same Political Outfit’s condition is getting worse every passing day. They need a “Baisakhi” to move forward and I believe they see one in Mr Sachin.

The only thing I can pray is that History will not be repeated and India will again not lose one of its biggest entertainers because of DIRTY POLITICS.

Please note: it is important to mention that Mr Amitabh was able to face the storm and re-emerge as a Winner.

What would Central government have done if US Rejected Sonia Gandhi’s US Visa

USA rejected travel visa of one of the Chief Minister’s of India.

For the Central Government this rejection was not of one of the Chief Minister but of N Modi.

India is both a Union and Federal. When an External Country rejects a visa of a Federal Head then should the Union gloat over this fact or Protest with the External Country.

We never heard of MEA taking up this issue with USA. But in many TV Discussions we saw many Congress Party and Government spokesperson’s gloating over the rejection of the Visa.

Did internal politics made the government forget that the rejection of a Chief Minister’s visa is more embarrassing for the Union than anybody else.

This was not a Gujarati issue but an Indian Issue.

If tomorrow USA rejects Mrs Gandhis visa, will the government stay a mute spectator or will it protest to the extent of endangering external relations.

The government must protest in this case as Mrs Gandhi is the Political Head of the Central Government.

But then should they have not protested when N Modi’s visa was rejected. He might be their Political Opponent but he is a Federal Head first.


AGREE??????

Congress must not repeat the same mistake with Rahul that BJP did with Modi

Congress must not repeat the same mistake with Rahul that BJP did with Modi

Many Epics have been written over the Insane 2002 Gujarat Riots. As per the Congress party, Secular Activists and Secular TV Media Modi was directly responsible for the Carnage.

But to my very surprise nobody till now looked upon the Bio Data of N Modi. There lies a very strong reason on why 2002 were handled by the Gujarat government as they were.

N Modi joined BJP in 1987. By the End of 2001 he was chosen to be CM of Gujarat by BJP leadership.

Before Joining BJP, Modi worked with RSS. There was no Administration Experience as such.

When N Modi was made a chief minister he had no experience in State Administration. He was never a Minister before or had any Bureaucratic Experience.

The BJP Leadership thought he can be a good and effective CM because he has been able to rejuvenate the BJP Cadre in Gujarat.

But the BJP leadership did not think it was important for a CM to have at least some past administrative experience.

I think this In-experience was the main reason why Gujarat 2002 was not handled in an Ideal Administrative Riot Control Manner. No body has a magic sick to control riots effectively. It is the Experience of the Leadership that makes the administration effective.

The BJP or Gujarat government will never accept this as it will showcase them in a bad light.

The Congress party, Secular Activists and Secular TV Media don’t want to accept this as then they cannot make demon out of N Modi. As then it would become an Administrative failure because of In-Experience of the Gujarat Government.

Today we can say that N Modi is the best Administrator as well as the Best CM of India. Probably he learnt from his In-experience and no riots happened since then.

So what should be the price for and Administration In-Experience?

If we go back into history and look at the Sikh Riots, Late Shri Rajiv Gandhi was also In-Experienced and the administration was not able to control riots effectively.

So how does all this now links to Congress Party. We have been hearing the Rahul for PM Campaign by all senior Congress Leaders. Mr Jaiswal wants to give the crown at midnight just like the Midnight Stroke of Independence.

Rahul is also working in the Party. He is trying to rejuvenate the Congress Cadre. Trying to Rebuild Youth Congress. But do we know anything related to his Administration Capabilities. The PM is a much serious Post in comparison to a CM. Do we want to revisit the debate because of Administration In-Experience in Future? Will India pay again for Leadership In-Experience in Future?

If agree, Pls Share.