Bits and Pieces of Partition of 1947 visiting in 2012

Bits and Pieces of Partition of 1947 visiting in 2012

1.       The new generation of India have heard stories about the 1947 Partition.

2.       I always thought that how can we have mass exodus of citizens on the basis of events happening in the other part of the country.

3.       Well if we look at the recent events with the North East Indians we can relate how much worse it would have been in 1947.

4.       I urge the Congress party that although they were not able to stop the 1947 Partition. But hope they will take much needed Proactive steps that kills this Fear Environment.

5.       We had a similar exodus for Kashmiri Pundits. But that was restricted with one part of the country. This time around it has already touched Pune / Mumbai / Chennai / Bangalore / Hyderabad.

6.       It all started with Mumbai. Why did it then spread to other parts?

7.       Amar Jawan Jyoti, A National Symbol was destroyed in a shameful manner. Pseudo secularists will slam me for my next statement. But I feel this was a more shameful act even more then the demolition of Babri Masjid. This was a National Symbol representing our Marty’s being vandalised.

8.       Women Constables Molested. And many other shameful acts performed.

9.       Many Pseudo secularists appreciated the role of the Mumbai Police for handling the Mumbai shame with Patience.

10.   The reason being given that if the Mumbai Police had tried to have a strict face for the Goons then it would have created further Communal Problems.

11.   If tomorrow someone tries to vandalize Parliament, another Indian National Symbol then also the Police must then let that happen but not have a strict action as it might further lead to communal problems.

12.   That means strict action can only be used for Peaceful Agitations that Ramdev had and Delhi Police used all available tools to wake up and terrorize sleeping Citizens in the middle of Night.

13.   I still feel that if Mumbai would have been rightly tackled and a clear signal sent to the rioters then the fire would not have spread to other Indian Cities.

14.   Probably I and Pseudo secularists have a different understanding of the situation. I am only an Ordinary citizen who wants a peaceful nation and wants Its National Symbols to be given Utmost respect.

1.       Should this approach of Mumbai Police be taken as a Benchmark and adopted for all type of MOB Violence? This will be music to Bajrang Dal/VHP.

2.       Government of India believes that the Rumours started from Pakistan. This is a bigger issue as we cannot stop the speakers of Pakistan. Can we stop Hafiz Sayeed from spitting venom against India? Then how the government does plans to stop anonymous users of Social Media all across the globe including Pakistan.

3.       Since the government cannot stop the speakers, at least we must try to reign in the Listeners. Listeners who belonged to the Mumbai Mob. I believe they were fellow Indians and not from any Foreign country.

4.       I still feel that North East Indians were not scared by posts on the Social Media. But they never had the Confidence in the Government that they will be protected. They felt at danger from other Fellow Indians.

5.       UPA and Congress also did not sent the right message across the NORTH EAST Indians. We had Sushma Swaraj/ Nitin Gadhkari/ Banglore Home and Chief Minister interacting One to One with the North East Indians. Those images were circulated by Our Media and sent a very clear signal.

6.       But I was not able to see any NORTH EAST Indian face alongside our PM, UPA Chairperson, Home Minister. Probably that symbolism would have sent the right signal.

7.       Or probably the congress thought that currently there is Muslim anger against North East Indians. Hence they did not want to be photographed alongside them. We don’t know.

Pakistani Hindu, Bangladeshi Muslim and the UPA Government

Pakistani Hindu, Bangladeshi Muslim and the UPA Government

There are media reports that around 250 odd Pakistani Hindu families want to find shelter in India. As per some media reports the External Affairs Ministry says that the issue needs to be looked upon by the Home Ministry. Shelter for the families will depend on their condition and so on.

Many leading Personalities have been critical of the position taken by the Government including Past Diplomats like G Parthasarthy. They want the government to proactively listen to their concerns.

This approach by the Upa Government is confusing me.  Following are the points that have arisen out of that confusion:

1.       We all agree that the recent Assam Violence was due to illegal immigration of Bangladeshi Muslims in Lakhs into Assam.

2.       There are allegations that these illegal immigrants get valid citizenship documents with the help of local authorities.

3.       The UPA government must be in the know how of things happening. We have indirectly allowed the illegal immigration of Bangladeshi Muslims into India.

4.       It looks like that the UPA Government is not so keen on the Pakistani Hindus to Immigrate into India.

5.       There can be two reasons: Either we don’t like Pakistan and we like Bangladesh or we don’t want Hindus to Immigrate into India but want immigration for Muslims.

6.       It is very important to understand that the Bangladeshi Muslims illegally immigrated into India for better prospects. It was not that they were being threatened or killed or being converted or their girls were being abducted.

7.       On the other hand the Pakistani Hindus want to immigrate back to India because of the above very reasons.

8.       So should we tell to the Pakistani Hindus that the only way to immigrate to India is first get Bangladeshi Citizenship. Then get converted to Islam. Then Enter Assam. Then get your citizenship papers made and then move freely anywhere in India.

9.       Please remember that the only country that the Pakistani Hindus can look upon is India. For Bangladeshi Muslims there are many other Islamic nations that would be more than happy to help. In case India has bandwidth we must support them.

Looking at this chain of Events we all must be happy that Kashmir is Part of India.

Because if Kashmir was another country that the Kashmiri Pundits must have been filling the Immigration forms when Ethnic Cleansing was happening. At least now they can thank that they have got refuge in India without filling the very same Immigration Papers.

Shri Chidambaram as Home Minister was now a liability for UPA

 Shri Chidambaram as Home Minister was now a liability for UPA

Following are the reasons why Shri Chidambaram was a Liability for UPA as HOME MINISTER

1.       Ramdev: The Home Ministery and Delhi Police handled the Ramdev Eviction in a most Un-professional Manner. There was a lot of anger form public society on that very issue. Ramdev has said he will be revisiting Delhi on 9 Aug. Probably UPA Leadership thought that Chidambaram might bring more embarrassment to the UPA again.

2.       Batla House Encounter and Next Gen Elections: Mr Digvijay Singh (Mouth Piece of Gandhi Family) had suggested that it might be a Fake Encounter. Some Congressmen also suggested that Mrs Gandhi had tears because of the same. Next general Elections may happen any time. The Minority Quota has been struck down by the Supreme Court. UPA thinks that this might help them win some Minority votes by removing Mr C as Home Minister.

3.       Saffron Terror: (Col Purohit and the Pragya Singh Thakur): There are media Reports that Col Purohit was not actually involved in the Terrorist acts, rather he was playing under cover to identify the Terror Module. There has been no Progress on Pragya case.  On top of it Shri Chidambaram invented the Saffron Terror Term. Keeping the next Gen Elections in mind UPA don’t want to be seen on the wrong side and probably thought that by taking Home Ministry from Mr C they would be able to calm emotions.

4.       Maoists: Mr C has been taking hard position against the Maoists. There are media reports that Mrs Gandhi/ Rahul Gandhi wanted a soft approach towards the Maoist issue. Again keeping the elections in mind and probably giving a soft message to the Maoists, Mr C was ousted from the Home Ministry.

5.       Budget for the Election year:  In the last general Elections Mr C presented a very Popular Budget. Many Analysts believe that the Popular Budget helped UPA in a big way and was a reason for their victory. Mr Pranab might not have allowed that to happen under his nose.  Mr C has done it earlier so let’s promote him as Finance Minister and hope for the Best.

6.       Mr C is not a Dalit: Mr Shinde, New Home Minister has said that he has been promoted as home Minister because he is a Dalit. It was Mr Rajiv Gandhi who promoted Mr Buta Singh, a dalit as a Home Minister. Now it was Sonia Gandhi’s turn to copy the act. Unfortunately Mr C is not a Dalit and Next Gen Elections are coming.

Congressmen defending Gujarat oops sorry, Assam Riots

Congressmen defending Gujarat oops sorry, Assam Riots

The Latest Riots in Incredible Indian history are significant because they give an insight on How Congressmen Would have defended the Gujarat Riots:

The following statements have been given by the Congressmen on Assam Riots (Just replace Assam with Gujarat and the rest is history)

Tarun Gogoi: If Centre knew, why didn't they send army earlier?

All the time for Gujarat riots we were criticizing Modi for calling the Army Late during Gujarat Riots and Congress Chief Minister just confirms that the Chief Minister can do nothing on this.

By the way in how many days was Army called for an Unexpected Event (Gujarat Riots) and in How many days was the army called where there were intelligence reports available9(Assam Riots)

A leading News Channel is now blaming the Army that it was not interested in going to Assam. De we allow Army to decide on such matters. Did Army reject going to Gujarat also?

Digvijaya: Assam has Ethnic Conflict History

Is this a justification for Riots. Then in that case Gujarat also had Communal Violence History before 2002.

Digvijaya: Gogoi cannot resign as you cannot judge the performance of Chief Minister on One incident

Hence we cannot judge the Performance of Modi on 2002 (Only One incident). Rather there have been no riots in Gujarat since 2002.

Digvijaya: When any Incident takes place it is the District Administration that tries to control the situation. We need to give them sufficient time to see that the situation is under control. The Army cannot be brought in every incident.

Let us use the same reasoning for 2002

Digvijaya: This is the fourth similar incident in last 2 decades.

Hope we don’t use this one ever.

Manishankar Aiyar: Gogoi has done wonderful job in Assam but it is the Local Administration was at fault.

Let us use this statement as is For Gujarat. Oops For Mani and Other Congress leaders, Gujarat means only and only N Modi.

Manishankar Aiyar: I am impressed with the fact (after Displacement of so many Assames)  the Administration is acting and is doing a good job.

Let us replace Assames by Gujaratis.

Manishankar Aiyar: BJP is totally discredited in Assam.

People will say Congress is totally discredited in Gujarat hence we must not listen to Congress.

Congressmen have been reasoning that Riots happened in Rural area but 2002 happened in the city of Ahmadabad. Well 1983 happened in the Capitol of India i.e New Delhi or was Delhi rural in 1983.

All congressmen have been explaining the reason on why the Riots happened.  All have different Technicalities. Let us try and put those technicalities for 2002.

I can go and try to find similar Statements by Congressmen when defending 1983.  And then reuse the same statements for 2002.

Similarly i can go back and look at the comments made for Bhagalpur and so on.

In China, communists killed Buddhism; In India Pseudo Secularists want to kill Hinduism

In China, communists killed Buddhism; In India Pseudo Secularists want to kill Hinduism

Every Indian regardless of his religion, faith, belief, cast or creed must have a special sensitivity towards Hinduism.

The Pseudo Secularists and many activists will consider the above statement as a very communal.

Islam is being practised by people in many different countries. Many scholars in different countries are researching further into the religion. Many governments and countries follow the very same religion. Funding / support are available from different states. Islam is not dependent on any group/ country or government.

The same can be said about Christianity. It gets support from many different quarters.

Let us look on what happened with Buddhism.  It found great following in China and became as the Faith of many Chinese. But as we recall History, we will see how the Chinese Communists killed the very same religion. Because Buddhism was not practised by any other group/ country hence it leads to its Death. Only Exiled Tibetans are now the torch bearers of the dim Buddhist flame.

Similarly Hinduism is also only practised by Indians. What will happen if we Indians (ALL FAITHS) do not support the very same religion? What happens if we don’t support this part of CIVILIZATION/ CULTURE/FAITH.

Hindu Faith symbols are found in India. 

We do not have Big Christianity or Islamic Symbols. We should develop them. But we must first try and preserve The Hindu Faith Symbols because if we falter at this then the next generations will know nothing about them. Generations of other faiths will be fortunate to view their faith symbols, if not in India then all across the Globe but Hindu faith generations will not be so lucky.

Today, if you wear anything saffron then you are in danger of being branded as Communal. 

Our Politicians also uses Saffron Terror as a Terrorist Group.  Let us not move into the Political space as they have vested Interests. 

But as a part of this Civilization and an Indian we must not repeat Chinese History. We all, regardless of our Political Affliation/Faith/Caste must support Hinduism.

We must all contribute towards this faith, not because this is a religion but because we all Indians have a responsibility in contributing towards this great symbol of CIVILIZATION.

Thank you Mamta for letting the president Nominee out of the COTERIE

Thank you Mamta for letting the president Nominee out of the COTERIE

A Lot of people have been criticizing Mamata for disclosing the participants of the UPA Presidential Nominee. She is now standing alone as she got the word out of the COTERIE.

She is a Grass root leader. I believe she speaks openly and does not believe in the COTERIE culture. And probably she felt it was important for the citizens of this country know on what is happening with the Highest Post of this country.

Today if the word is out that all the credit goes to Mamta. If she wouldn’t have had that interaction then i am sure that today also we all would have been speculating and would have been waiting to hear from the COTERIE.

But as a citizen of this country don’t I deserve to know who my President Nominees are.  Every day Media was speculating on the Possible Nominees. The decision was being taken by the COTERIE. We as citizens were hoping that one day the COTERIE will let us know who will it be.

Should we penalise Mamta for not following the COTERIE Politics or embrace her for actually believing in Democracy (Taking it out to the People).

Mr Krishna must now Protest with MCA for Mishandling SRK as it was done with the US Government

Mr Krishna must now Protest with MCA for Mishandling SRK as it was done with the US Government

Not far back Mr SRK was stopped for questioning by US Security Guards. Our External Affairs Minister was pained and openly protested with the US Government.

The Protest was so real and strong that the US Spokesperson had to regret for taking their security seriously.

This time around MR SRK’s Stardom was AGAIN challenged by a security guard who must be earning 10,000 Rs a Month.

When we cannot let US Security Guards to perform their duty how can we let an Indian Security guard get away with the same. Following the last precedence set by Our External Affairs Minister, the same must be repeated.

The security guard has to now pay a price for performing his duty.

Mr SRK defended his action by taking cover of a little girl who was ALLEGEDLY mishandled and he got annoyed.  He forgot that the very same girl must be watching when he would be abusing and shouting. Probably King Khan has the right for the same.

I am sure, when he was in US he never lost his cool. He never would have given abuses to the very same Security Guards.

But here in this case he had the right to abuse the security guard .Because he knows the External Affairs Minister would support this action. (This is a joke, please laugh..T his is all we can do looking at this incident)

Just One Q: Why has SRK still not lodged an FIR against the guard who ALLEGEDLY mishandled the girl.
Probably, He does not trusts the law (probably that is why he wanted to teach the guard a lesson by abusing him)